Kaspa’s circulating supply, a maddeningly inconsistent figure, hovers around 26.15 billion KAS per CoinMarketCap, yet strays to 26 billion on CoinGecko and 26.147 billion on Coinbase—a sloppy disparity that screams blockchain opacity. Why can’t these platforms align, and who’s accountable for this mess? Such discrepancies erode trust, demanding sharper scrutiny from anyone daring to invest. The numbers clash, the transparency falters, and the frustration festers. Stick around for deeper insight.

The enigmatic Kaspa (KAS), a blockchain project touting radical decentralization, boasts a circulating supply of roughly 26.15 billion tokens as of early May 2025—but can we trust these numbers? Dig deeper, and discrepancies emerge like cracks in a shaky foundation. CoinMarketCap pegs it at 26,155,179,102 KAS, Coinbase at 26,147,887,533.25, and CoinGecko rounds lazily to 26 billion. These variations, though slight, raise eyebrows—shouldn’t a blockchain, built on transparency, have ironclad data? The dynamic nature of live blockchains is a convenient excuse, but for a project preaching purity, even minor inconsistencies sting like betrayal.
Now, let’s dissect the bigger picture, because Kaspa’s tokenomics aren’t just numbers—they’re a battlefield of trust. The maximum supply, capped at 28.7 billion KAS, looms as a hard limit, a supposed safeguard against inflation, yet the fully diluted valuation tosses around 29 billion as a casual guess. Really? If precision matters, why the wiggle room? Currently, total supply mirrors circulating supply at 26.15 billion, per some sources, but that’s a snapshot, not a promise. New tokens trickle in via mining, dictated by an emission schedule that halves yearly through a smugly named “chromatic phase”—a smooth monthly decay by (1/2)^(1/12). Clever, sure, but does this complexity mask or clarify the pace of dilution? With a market capitalization of approximately $3.1 billion, Kaspa’s valuation reflects significant investor interest despite these uncertainties market capitalization $3.1 billion. Additionally, Kaspa achieves an impressive block rate of 10 per second on its mainnet, showcasing its scalability potential block rate 10/sec. The project follows a deflationary model where all coins are expected to be mined by approximately mid-2037 deadline, creating scarcity similar to Bitcoin’s approach but with Kaspa’s distinctive emission mechanics.
Mining, the lifeblood of Kaspa’s fair launch since November 2021, is another sore point. No pre-mine, no pre-sales, just pure, community-driven distribution—or so they claim. From CPUs to GPUs in 2021, FPGAs, and ASICs by 2023, the tech race reshapes who controls the rewards. Block rates aim for 10 per second, dreaming bigger, yet emission stays fixed per second, adjusting rewards if speed shifts. Fine, but as hardware evolves, doesn’t power consolidate? Decentralization sounds noble, yet mining efficiency often breeds gatekeepers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Is Kaspa’s Total Supply Limit?
Kaspa’s total supply limit is a topic of interest for many in the cryptocurrency space. It is set at approximately 28.7 billion KAS coins, a fixed cap embedded in the protocol to guarantee scarcity.
How Is Kaspa’s Supply Schedule Determined?
Kaspa’s supply schedule is determined through a structured monetary policy with a Pre-deflationary Phase and a Chromatic Phase, featuring geometrically decreasing block rewards that halve annually, adjusted monthly using a musical scale analogy.
Who Controls Kaspa’s Supply Issuance?
The control of Kaspa’s supply issuance lies with its protocol and predetermined emission schedule. No central entity governs it, ensuring a decentralized, transparent process managed by the community and automated systems.
Can Kaspa’s Supply Ever Be Changed?
The possibility of changing Kaspa’s supply exists only through a hard fork, requiring network consensus. Without widespread agreement, a split could occur. Currently, the community and developers remain committed to the fixed supply.
Why Was Kaspa’s Supply Model Chosen?
Kaspa’s supply model was chosen to guarantee scarcity and long-term value through a capped maximum supply and deflationary emission schedule. This design mirrors sound monetary principles, aiming to prevent inflation and support sustainability.